The committee for the 2020 Melvin Pollner Prize in
Ethnomethodology, consisting of Götz Hoeppe (Chair), Alex Dennis and Nozomi
Ikeya, is pleased to announce the recipient of this year’s award:
R.J. Anderson and W. W. Sharrock. Action at a
Distance: Studies in the Practicalities of Executive Management. London and New
York: Routledge, 2018.
Anderson and Sharrock’s Action at a Distance is a
significant contribution to ethnomethodology and management studies. Drawing
upon their own experiences as and with managers, the authors consider documents
as ordering devices for the co-ordinated action of organizational work, through
which managers influence the actions of others who are separated by time,
physical and organizational space, thereby “creating the organization as a
consociate social structure.” Their analysis demonstrates ethnomethodological
studies can be fruitfully undertaken on actions without face to face
interaction, i.e., “action at a distance.” This sophisticated analysis informs
and exemplifies the reconceptualisation of ethnomethodology as a “first
sociology” (disclosing what sociology presupposes), and introduces “third
person phenomenology” as a study policy. Third person phenomenology provides a
third person description of the internal configuration of first person
experience without immersive fieldwork. Anderson and Sharrock thus formulate a
thoughtfully argued response to Pollner’s late critique of ethnomethodology’s
accommodation to conventional sociology, eradicating the distinction between
members and analysts, and generating accounts that simply repeat what members
say. This response is framed as a pair of problems. Firstly, how can one “bracket”
the assumptions of the natural attitude when they are necessarily part and
parcel of sociological work? Secondly, what is the status of
ethnomethodological claims: are they objectivist findings or situated
construals? Given the technical sophistication of Pollner’s critique, their
creative response is useful both within and outside the EMCA community in
advancing the understanding of ethnomethodology.
Excellent
ReplyDelete