The
award committee—consisting of Sarah Hitzler (Chair), Christian Meier and Tanya
Tyagunova—recommends
Joonas
Råman’s paper “Budo Demonstrations as Shared Accomplishments: The modalities of
guiding in the joint teaching of physical skills”, published in the Journal of
Pragmatics in 2019,
for
this year’s Best Student Paper Award of the ASA section Ethnomethodology and
Conversation Analysis.
In
his paper “Budo demonstrations as shared accomplishments: The modalities of
guiding in the joint teaching of physical skills”, Joonas Råman aims to show
how martial arts instructors rely on the knowledge, competence and compliance
of assistants in order to make comprehensible physical skills to an audience.
This very precise and levelled analysis opens up new perspectives on
instruction and demonstration by conducting a shift away from instructors and
making visible the work conducted by their partners. The work of instructing is
practically accomplished via cooperative demonstration, so another shift is
undertaken away from dyadic settings between teachers and students toward a
triadic setting in which epistemic and deontic authority are unequally
distributed, but flexibly so. In addition, Råman fruitfully calls into question
the concept of ‘adjacency pairs’ and argues that rather than being necessarily
adjacent, actions may be ‘paired’ and collaboratively geared towards the same
end. Joonas Råman’s paper offers a detailed and rich empirical description of
the phenomenon of “doing being a good uke”, by highlighting features of
instructional work in budo demonstrations, which enable joint-teaching, i.e.
the guiding demonstrations, in a way that substantively relies on displaying
pedagogical competences on part of teacher’s assistants producing responses
that might not necessarily be expected by their teachers. The study opens up
avenues for further debate with regard to embodied cooperation, demonstrations,
and the intertwinement of epistemics and authority in cooperative activities.
ReplyDeleteAn exciting topic without a doubt that gives rise to an extensive debate