Wednesday, August 3, 2016
Accessibility and childcare at ASA 16
Dear All
At the links here you can find the accessibility guide to the ASA meeting location at the Washington State Convention and Trade Centre
And here you can find the downtown seattle accessibility map and transit guide
Below is a list of the children's activities in the area.
See you all soon
ASA EMCA Committee
At the links here you can find the accessibility guide to the ASA meeting location at the Washington State Convention and Trade Centre
And here you can find the downtown seattle accessibility map and transit guide
Below is a list of the children's activities in the area.
See you all soon
ASA EMCA Committee
Children's activities in Seattle
| Bill City | Bill State | Bill Zip | Web Site | ||
| 5th Avenue Theatre | 1326 Fifth Ave, Ste 735 | Seattle | WA | 98101 | http://5thavenue.org |
| ACME Bowling Billiards and Events | 100 Andover Park W | Tukwila | WA | 98188 | http://acmebowl.com |
| Argosy Cruises and Tillicum Village Excursion | 1101 Alaskan Way, Pier 55, Ste 201 | Seattle | WA | 98101 | http://argosycruises.com |
| Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture | 17th Ave NE and NE 45th St | Seattle | WA | 98195 | http://burkemuseum.org |
| Chihuly Garden and Glass | 305 Harrison St | Seattle | WA | 98109 | http://chihulygardenandglass.com |
| Emerald Queen Hotel & Casinos | 5700 Pacific Hwy E | Fife | WA | 98424 | http://emeraldqueen.com |
| EMP Museum | 325 Fifth Ave N | Seattle | WA | 98109 | http://EMPmuseum.org |
| Frye Art Museum | 704 Terry Ave | Seattle | WA | 98104 | http://fryemuseum.org |
| Future of Flight Aviation Center & Boeing Tour | 8415 Paine Field Blvd | Mukilteo | WA | 98275 | http://futureofflight.org |
| GameWorks | 1511 Seventh Ave | Seattle | WA | 98101 | http://gameworks.com |
| Kids Discovery Museum | 301 Ravine Ln NE | Bainbridge Island | WA | 98110 | http://kidimu.org |
| Lucky Strike Lanes | 700 Bellevue Way NE, Ste 250 | Bellevue | WA | 98004 | http://bowlluckystrike.com |
| Museum of Glass | 1801 Dock St | Tacoma | WA | 98402 | http://museumofglass.org |
| Museum of History & Industry (MOHAI) | 860 Terry Ave N | Seattle | WA | 98109 | http://mohai.org |
| Nordic Heritage Museum | 3014 NW 67th St | Seattle | WA | 98117 | http://nordicmuseum.org |
| Northwest Trek Wildlife Park | 11610 Trek Dr E | Eatonville | WA | 98328 | http://nwtrek.org |
| Pacific Science Center | 200 Second Ave N | Seattle | WA | 98109 | http://pacificsciencecenter.org |
| Point Defiance Zoo & Aquarium | 5400 N Pearl St | Ruston | WA | 98407 | http://pdza.org |
| Savor Seattle Food Tours | 1501 Western Ave, Ste 301 | Seattle | WA | 98101 | http://savorseattletours.com |
| Seattle Aquarium | 1483 Alaskan Way, Pier 59 | Seattle | WA | 98101 | http://seattleaquarium.org |
| Seattle Asian Art Museum | 1400 E Prospect | Seattle | WA | 98122 | http://seattleartmuseum.org |
| Seattle Center | 305 Harrison St | Seattle | WA | 98109 | http://seattlecenter.com |
| Seattle Center Monorail | 370 Thomas St, Ste 200 | Seattle | WA | 98109 | http://seattlemonorail.com |
| Seattle Children's Museum | 305 Harrison St | Seattle | WA | 98109 | http://thechildrensmuseum.org |
| Seattle Children's Theatre | 201 Thomas St | Seattle | WA | 98109 | http://sct.org |
| Seattle Glassblowing Studio & Gallery | 2227 Fifth Ave | Seattle | WA | 98121 | http://seattleglassblowing.com |
| Seattle Great Wheel | 1301 Alaskan Way | Seattle | WA | 98101 | http://seattlegreatwheel.com |
| Seattle Mariners Baseball Club | 1250 First Ave S | Seattle | WA | 98134 | http://www.mariners.com |
| Seattle Pinball Museum | 508 Maynard Ave S | Seattle | WA | 98104 | http://seattlepinballmuseum.com |
| Segway in Seattle | 2705 California Ave SW | Seattle | WA | 98116 | http://wcent.com/segways |
| SkyMania Trampolines | 11801 NE 116th St, Ste B | Kirkland | WA | 98034 | http://skymaniatrampolines.com |
| Space Needle | 223 Taylor Ave North | Seattle | WA | 98109 | http://spaceneedle.com |
| The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Visitor Center | 818 Stewart Street | Seattle | WA | 98101 | http://visitorcenter.gatesfoundation.org |
| The Bloedel Reserve | 7571 NE Dolphin Dr | Bainbridge Island | WA | 98110 | http://bloedelreserve.org |
| The Center for Wooden Boats | 1010 Valley St | Seattle | WA | 98109 | http://cwb.org |
| The Living Computer Museum | 2245 First Ave S | Seattle | WA | 98134 | http://livingcomputermuseum.org |
| The Museum of Flight | 9404 E Marginal Way S | Seattle | WA | 98108 | http://museumofflight.org |
| Underground Tour, Bill Speidel's | 614 First Avenue | Seattle | WA | 98104 | http://undergroundtour.com |
| Wild Waves Theme Park | 36201 Enchanted Pkwy S | Federal Way | WA | 98003 | http://wildwaves.com |
| Wing Luke Museum of the Asian Pacific American Experience | 719 S King St | Seattle | WA | 98104 | http://wingluke.org |
| Woodland Park Zoo | 5500 Phinney Ave N | Seattle | WA | 98103 | http://zoo.org |
Sunday, July 3, 2016
Pre ASA symposium on theory
10th Junior Theorists Symposium
August 19, 2016
Seattle University
Wyckoff Auditorium (Engineering 200)
In order to facilitate lunch orders and planning, the organizers request that folks please RSVP by sending an email to juniortheorists@gmail.com with the subject line “JTS RSVP.” JTS is a donation-based event, and we kindly suggest donations of $20 per faculty member and $10 per graduate student, which can be made at the event, or in advance of the event through PayPal to the juniortheorists@gmail.com email account.
If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to write to the organisers, Anna Skarpelis (aks402@nyu.edu) or Clayton Childress (cchildress@utsc.utoronto.ca)
Seattle University
Wyckoff Auditorium (Engineering 200)
Wednesday, June 29, 2016
ASA Distinguished paper award 16
Dear all
We wish to congratulate Catelijne Coopmans and Graham Button on the award of the ASA EMCA distinguished paper award for
Coopmans, Catelijne & Button, Graham (2014) “Eyeballing Expertise”, Social Studies of Science, 44(5): 758-785.
This paper offers an ethnomethodological study of the job of classifying eyes, in view of detecting ‘diabetic retinopathy’, at the Singapore Advanced Imaging Laboratory for Ocular Research. The study does not only develop a highly perceptive analysis of diagnostic work at this medical facility, but it does also offer an exemplary demonstration of ‘ethnomethodological respecification’ in and for the field of science and technology studies (STS). It does so by offering an empirical reappraisal of H. Collins’ recent ‘theory of expertise’. Instead of classifying different kinds of possible expertise urbi et orbi (as Collins, in collaboration with R. Evans, does), the paper homes in on how a distinctive set of procedural skills (or ‘technical expertise’) is actually drawn upon in situ. This empirical reappraisal of Collins’ theory – to our knowledge, the first of its kind – is of analytic import for the social study of ‘tacit knowledge’ in EM, STS and beyond. It notably demonstrates the heuristic interest of the shift from a broad theory of ‘ubiquitous expertises’ (sic) and their classification (‘what is expertise?’, ‘who can possess it?’, ‘how should it be classified?’, etc.) to a subtle description of enacted expertise as an ethnomethodological phenomenon, including classification as a constitutive part of a distinctively technical, yet plainly observable practice (‘expert eye grading, in action and interaction’). Thereby, the paper dissolves some of the ‘puzzles’ of Collins’ (and Evans’) ‘normative theory of expertise’, puzzles that appear as technical artifacts of their ‘philosophically oriented social science’ (Collins, Evans 2007:7). In marrying descriptive analysis and conceptual critique, Coopmans’ and Button's respecification offers an insightful articulation of different strands of ethnomethodological inquiry, which may thus also have paradigmatic implications for related fields, including not only STS but also systems and interface design, if not the social sciences at large.
We wish to congratulate Catelijne Coopmans and Graham Button on the award of the ASA EMCA distinguished paper award for
Coopmans, Catelijne & Button, Graham (2014) “Eyeballing Expertise”, Social Studies of Science, 44(5): 758-785.
This paper offers an ethnomethodological study of the job of classifying eyes, in view of detecting ‘diabetic retinopathy’, at the Singapore Advanced Imaging Laboratory for Ocular Research. The study does not only develop a highly perceptive analysis of diagnostic work at this medical facility, but it does also offer an exemplary demonstration of ‘ethnomethodological respecification’ in and for the field of science and technology studies (STS). It does so by offering an empirical reappraisal of H. Collins’ recent ‘theory of expertise’. Instead of classifying different kinds of possible expertise urbi et orbi (as Collins, in collaboration with R. Evans, does), the paper homes in on how a distinctive set of procedural skills (or ‘technical expertise’) is actually drawn upon in situ. This empirical reappraisal of Collins’ theory – to our knowledge, the first of its kind – is of analytic import for the social study of ‘tacit knowledge’ in EM, STS and beyond. It notably demonstrates the heuristic interest of the shift from a broad theory of ‘ubiquitous expertises’ (sic) and their classification (‘what is expertise?’, ‘who can possess it?’, ‘how should it be classified?’, etc.) to a subtle description of enacted expertise as an ethnomethodological phenomenon, including classification as a constitutive part of a distinctively technical, yet plainly observable practice (‘expert eye grading, in action and interaction’). Thereby, the paper dissolves some of the ‘puzzles’ of Collins’ (and Evans’) ‘normative theory of expertise’, puzzles that appear as technical artifacts of their ‘philosophically oriented social science’ (Collins, Evans 2007:7). In marrying descriptive analysis and conceptual critique, Coopmans’ and Button's respecification offers an insightful articulation of different strands of ethnomethodological inquiry, which may thus also have paradigmatic implications for related fields, including not only STS but also systems and interface design, if not the social sciences at large.
Sunday, May 29, 2016
Thomas Luckmann dies aged 88
Peter
Stegmaier (Department of Science, Technology, and Policy Studies, University of
Twente) & Dirk vom Lehn (School of Management and Business, King's College London)
Thomas
Luckmann was born in 1927 in the Slovenian town of Jesenice, than soon after
became a part of the Yugoslavian Kingdom. Growing up bilingually at the Slovenian-Austrian
boarder he received a broad humanist education. After WWII, Luckmann moved to
Vienna where he first finished school and then studied linguistics and
philosophy. He later moved to Innsbruck to study psychology, egyptology, French
philology, and history. Right after marrying in 1950, first his wife Benita
Luckmann and then 1951 Thomas came to New York, destitute, where he first worked
as chauffeur for a known lawyer and as builder on his property, and his wife as
steno typist at the Wall Street, then continuing their studies in philosophy
and sociology at the Graduate Faculty of the New School for Social Research.
Here, some of Luckmann’s teachers were Alfred Schütz, Karl Löwith, Carl Mayer
(through whom he later met Arnold Gehlen), and here as a student he met with Peter
L. Berger. In 1951, the young couple had a first of later three daughters (Maja,
Mara, Metka), attending lectures after five, in shifts, and learning during late
evening (Schnettler 2006).
After
completing his studies, Luckmann first taught at Hobart College, New York, before
returning to the New School for Social Research as successor of his teacher
Alfred Schütz, with Peter L. Berger as colleague, from 1962-3 as colleague and
friend also of Helmuth Plessner’s. In 1965 he returned to Germany where he
received a call to a chair at University of Frankfurt am Main. In 1970, Luckmann
became Professor for Sociology at University of Constance where he stayed until
his retirement in 1994.
The
richness and influence of Luckmann’s Å“uvre can be ascribed to its grounding in
a range of sociological, anthropological, and philosophical traditions with a
deep cultural-historical understanding. Luckmann combines the phenomenological
thinking of Edmund Husserl and Alfred Schütz, Karl Mannheim’s sociology of
knowledge and the anthropologies of Arnold Gehlen and Helmuth Plessner as well
as the American pragmatists George Herbert Mead, William James, and John Dewey,
and the later developing sociological perspectives of symbolic interactionism
and ethnomethodology.
Luckmann
probably best-known book is “The Social Construction of Reality—A Treatise in
the Sociology of Knowledge” (1966) that he wrote together with Peter L. Berger
… although, as he once put it, Luckmann and Berger actually wrote it
“four-headed”, “because we both discussed what we were doing with our wives,
who were scholars in their own right” (Dreher 2014). The influence of this book
is enormous, if not, in some areas, pervasive, yet hard to quantify. It has
been translated in many languages. Ideas and phrases (“the social construction
of …”) have been trivialised through more or less thoughtful use—often a sign
for impact far beyond narrow academic circles. Importantly, many authors have
build explicitly on it since it was first published half a century ago; nonetheless
many authors developed their own successful theoretical or empirical approaches
with less explicit reference to it, in continuation of or in demarcation from
it.
The
book can be read, although not directly meant as a fundamental critique of (structural)
functionalist reason. It also treats psychoanalysis with a little bit of irony.
At the core, it amalgamates the sociologies of Emil Durkheim with Max Weber in
the famous lead question: “How is it possible that human activity (Handeln) should produce a world of
things (choses)?” (Berger &
Luckmann 1966: 18). The ‘Social Construction’ provides a broad, not really
specific theory that can and has been used as a set of general heuristics for
grasping the historicity of what counts as real and relevant in a world shared
by fellow humans, full also of things and non-humans, mainly focussing on their
meaningful interactions. The book is deeply anthropological by recognising the
importance of the body and the organism, of social things and their histories.
Although often used as theoretical reference, it develops its great strengths
especially when empirically studying all kinds of specific interactions and
communications (in case of Luckmann himself: communicative genres as
institutionalised routines, moral communication in particular). Its charm and actuality
emerges from permanently urging the researcher to account both for the given
structures and the actually just occurring interactions that make the world to
what it is in that moment for those involved and later for those taking notice
of how it was so far seen as real and normal.
Of
enormous importance for the development of various contemporary discussions in
sociology is the book “The Structures of the Life-World” (1974) that Luckmann
developed from the notes and documents bequeathed unfinished by Alfred Schütz
after his premature death in 1959. The Structures of the Life-World” have
become a classic sociological text that provides the basis for sociological
phenomenology and recent developments in the sociology of knowledge. In the
book, Luckmann (and Schütz) unfold a theory to inform social theory, a
conception of how a person’s life-world is constituted by individually and
intersubjectively inhabiting a world of unquestioned everyday character.
A
particular interest of Luckmann’s research has always been the role of religion
in modern societies. Whilst Max Weber had highlighted the secularisation of
society, Luckmann showed already in the 1960s how religion features in modern
societies by virtue of a transformation of symbols. In 1967, he published the
book ‘The Invisible Religion’ with a very broad notion of religiosity that can
literally encompass everything, thereby allowing for discovering new or
different forms of religiosity, less or not at all associated with an
officially registered religious community. He distinguished small (within the
everyday), middle-range (only indirect), and great (far beyond everyday reality
reaching) transcendences. His theory of signs, symbols, and rituals is a
logical and fruitful further elaboration of his effort to trace transcendences
into all corners of social life. His analyses have provided the basis for the
emergence of discussions about “popular religion” and “intermediary
institutions”.
His
studies into genres in (oral) communication laid the foundation for the
emergence of the sociology of language and communication. In this area, his
best-known work explores the “Communicative Construction of Moral” (with Jörg
Bergmann, 1999). The recent emergence of “communicative constructivism”
(Knoblauch 2013) as a new strand of theory and research pays testimony to the
sustained impact of Luckmann’s work to the present day. Throughout his career
Luckmann published in multiple languages and taught in different parts of the
world making him a truly transcultural social theorist (Schnettler 2006). His
work therefore was received well not only in Europe but also elsewhere in the
world. Moreover, the influence of his work ripples through the social sciences
and reaches also into the information sciences (e.g. Martin et al. 2012: 1192; Luckmann
2005).
Luckmann
has questioned taken-for-granted assumptions about the equation of what is
social and is human. From cultural anthropology and history he follows that what
counts as social can be very different and changing. He always emphasised,
often with a dry sense of humour, that he would stand for a “realist” position,
especially when reminding so-called “constructivists” or “constructionists” of
how much the materiality of things matters and which manifold roles it can play
in the various social formations und dominating definitions of a ‘social world’
(Luckmann 1980). Scientific knowledge is seen in relation to everyday common
sense knowledge as special knowledge. Science, in his view, different than
religion, has failed to offer meaning to last questions because it is
falsifiable in principle, never able to claim ultimate truths and has therefore
run into its ‘cosmological fiasco’ of never having found the Archimedean point from
which both world and reality could be explained as well as this explanation
could be explained itself (Luckmann 1999, 1973).
Thomas
Luckmann remained active in German and international sociology and in conversation
with many neighbouring disciplines until very recently. On Tuesday, 10 May, he
has died after a long illness in his mountain home in Carinthia, Austria (not
far from the Slovenian boarder).
Sources
Berger, P. L., &
Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction
of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, New
York: Doubleday
Bergmann, J., &
Luckmann, T. (Eds.). (1999). Kommunikative Konstruktion von Moral. Band 1:
Struktur und Dynamik der Formen moralischer Kommunikation (Vol. 1) & Band
2: Von der Moral zu den Moralen (Vol. 2). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Dreher, Jochen
(2014): 50th Anniversary Social Construction Thomas Luckmann.
Sozialwissenschaftliches Archiv, Konstanz, at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObEsOZxslfE
Knoblauch, H. (2013). Communicative
constructivism and mediatization. Communication
Theory, 23(3), 297–315.
doi:10.1111/comt.12018
Luckmann, T. (2005). On the communicative construction of
reality. Lecture to the LSE Department of Information Systems 2nd February 2005
Luckmann,
T. (1999). Das kosmologische Fiasko der Soziologie. In R. Hitzler, J.
Reichertz, & N. Schröer (Eds.), Hermeneutische Wissenssoziologie.
Standpunkte zur Theorie der Interpretation (pp. 309-318). Konstanz: UVK
Luckmann,
T. (1980). Über die Grenzen der Sozialwelt Lebenswelt und Gesellschaft (pp.
56-92). Paderborn et al.: Schöningh
Luckmann,
T. (1973). Philosophy, Science and Everyday Life. In M. A. Natanson (Ed.),
Phenomenology and the Social Sciences Vol. 1 (pp. 143-185). Evanston/Ill.:
Northwestern UP
Luckmann, T. (1967). The invisible religion. New York:
MacMillan
Martin, B., Nightingale,
P., & Yegros-Yegros, A. (2012). Science and technology studies: Exploring
the knowledge base. Research Policy,
41, 1182-1204. doi:doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.010
Pawlowski, T., &
Schmitz, H. W. (Eds.). (2003). 30 Jahre “Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der
Wirklichkeit”. Gespräch mit Thomas Luckmann. Essen: Shaker
Schnettler, B. (2006). Thomas Luckmann. Konstanz: UVK
Monday, May 9, 2016
Wednesday, April 20, 2016
CFP SPQ
|
An Official Journal of the American Sociological Association
April 20, 2016
Dear Section Members,
We are writing because we have learned that a
significant number of members in this section also are members of the social
psychology section. In an effort to expand the breadth of the journal, we are
reaching out to you to encourage you to consider submitting your work to SPQ.
We would like to attract more contributions to the journal from a broad base of
researchers who use social psychological approaches. SPQ is publishing full
length (10,000 words) theoretical and empirical Articles and Research Notes (5,000
words). We think that for many in this
section, this would include your work.
We want you to know that we are committed to
making editorial decisions in a timely manner. Over the past year and half, we
have average 35 days from submission to first decision.
We hope that you will send your scholarship
to Social Psychology Quarterly. Please contact us if you have any questions
about a manuscript or the journal, more generally.
Kind Regards,
Richard
T. Serpe, Professor Jan
E. Stets, Professor
Kent State University University of California, Riverside
Kent State University University of California, Riverside
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)